Throughout the recent debacle in Welsh rugby, I’ve been very impressed with the work of the regions’ respective supporters’ clubs. They’ve been to meetings with the WRU and RRW, and have published an honest account of proceedings.
Recently, I was part of a group of supporters’ club representatives who wrote a letter of complaint to the BBC about the farcical ScrumV “Special” programme which was recorded in January. A programme all of us who were there know was heavily edited to favour the position of Roger Lewis. The response we received from the BBC could be best described as inadequate, and we are now going to raise this with the BBC Trust.
On Monday 17th February, representatives from the supporters’ clubs met RRW to discuss the ongoing crisis once again. The minutes of this meeting have now been published, with the approval of RRW. You can read them here.
The minutes of this latest meeting are disappointing for many reasons.
Firstly, it’s not clear who was in attendance.
Secondly, the minutes have no structure and the discussion points are not organised in a way which makes it simple to understand the various issues which were discussed.
Thirdly, there are basic grammatical errors which make the document difficult to read. In addition to this, the minutes are not written in an objective way. In fact at several points the writer adds emotive punctuation, such as exclamation marks, which makes it seem like a rant rather than a serious account of a meeting.
I’m all in favour of people venting their spleen about something which they clearly feel very passionate about, but these minutes have been approved by RRW’s public relations representative, and are now in the public domain. Is this really the standard of document RRW should be putting their name to?
We all know that the WRU are never shy in putting their position forward in the media, while RRW have preferred to keep their own counsel, as Roger Lewis might put it.
If this is the best RRW can do, maybe it’s better they keep quiet. These minutes are a mess.
Let me try and summarise the key points, because some of them are worth noting:
1. The WRU’s proposal for a new PA
It appears the terms of this are even more in favour of the WRU than the original PA. Central contracts are the order of the day, and the regions will have to release players for internationals outside the IRB window at their own expense, with no compensation from the WRU.
2. The new European Cup
The WRU have finally agreed to a new competition, not run by the ERC. But we already knew that.
Stuart Gallacher (RRW CEO) resigned from ERC once RRW had stated they supported the new Rugby Champions Cup, to avoid any conflict of interest. If Roger Lewis is involved in negotiations on a new European Cup, surely he should follow suit and resign from ERC to avoid a similar conflict of interest?
3. The outstanding ERC payments
The WRU Finance department assured RRW in an email back in January that the payments would be made as expected. The ERC board were supposed to meet before January to decide on whether the payment would be made, but that meeting never took place.
4. The TV position
Sky and BT have met, but there is no agreement
5. WRU accounts
A thorough review of WRU financial position is needed, in light of the surplus highlighted by David Moffett.
6. WRU governance
Are the WRU board holding CEO Roger Lewis to account? An independent inquiry is needed.
7. WRU Director of Rugby
Josh Lewsey was appointed by a one-man interview panel. What qualities make him suitable for this role?
8. Central contracts
Why is the WRU pursuing this unilateral policy when it is obvious they are not the solution?
9. Celtic League
There has been no progress in planning for the future, for example sponsorship, TV contracts and composition. What are the Irish and the Scots doing to help keep this league going? The Italians have already said they are ready to leave.
10. WRU “loans” to the regions
These have to be paid back by 31st March, even though it is not clear whether the money will ever be paid by ERC.
11. The Anglo Welsh League
This is still an option. The English clubs are also anxious to have a competition to help them sell season tickets.
None of this information is a surprise to those of us who have been following the issues. What is of most concern is that RRW don’t seem to be able to speak for themselves, and instead seem happy to rely on well-meaning but incoherent information from meetings with supporters.
If RRW want to achieve their goals, they need to adopt a far more professional approach to communication. The WRU are already miles ahead of them in the PR race. RRW are falling further and further behind by the day. This is too important a matter to ignore.